shopify_shop
Retrieve detailed information about a Shopify store using its domain and optional API credentials.
Instructions
Get Shopify store information.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| shop_domain | Yes | ||
| api_key | No | ||
| access_token | No |
Retrieve detailed information about a Shopify store using its domain and optional API credentials.
Get Shopify store information.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| shop_domain | Yes | ||
| api_key | No | ||
| access_token | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits but only says 'Get', implying read-only. It does not mention authentication needs, rate limits, or whether the operation is safe/destructive.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (5 words), but lacks any structure or front-loading of key information. It could benefit from a brief sentence on what info is returned.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with three parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is grossly incomplete. It does not explain the returned data, authentication flow, or any use cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the three parameters (shop_domain, api_key, access_token). The purpose of api_key and access_token is unclear.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves Shopify store information. It distinguishes from sibling tools (e.g., shopify_products, shopify_orders) which focus on specific entities.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like shopify_collections or shopify_customers, nor any context about prerequisites such as authentication.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/malamutemayhem/unclick'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server