twitch_schedule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It only says 'Get', implying a read operation, but does not disclose authentication needs, potential rate limits, or what the schedule contains (e.g., upcoming only, past, segments). The behavioral transparency is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (8 words), but this under-specification is not conciseness; it lacks necessary detail. Every word is wasted because no substantive information beyond the tool's basic purpose is provided.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the three parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is inadequate. It does not mention authentication requirements, the format of the schedule, or any constraints. The tool is a basic retrieval operation but still leaves significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the schema provides no parameter descriptions. The description does not explain the purpose of broadcaster_id, client_id, or client_secret, nor does it hint at their roles. The agent must infer their meaning from the tool name alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the purpose: retrieving a Twitch channel's streaming schedule. It uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('Twitch channel's streaming schedule'), and it distinguishes from sibling tools as no other sibling explicitly deals with schedules.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no context about required authentication parameters (client_id, client_secret). The agent is left without any usage hints.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.