sculpt_mask

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It lists actions but does not disclose side effects, requirements (e.g., specific mode), or behavior of each action in detail. The invert parameter is noted but lacking context on interaction with other actions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a clear front-loaded sentence. The Args section is structured but could be more succinct as plain text. Overall, every part serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and no output schema, the description adequately covers parameters but lacks information on mode requirements, return values, error handling, or interaction with other mask tools. It is adequate but leaves gaps for an agent without additional context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description adds significant value by explaining each parameter: mesh_name, action with enumerated list, vertex_group condition, and invert. However, not all actions are fully explained (e.g., difference between smooth and sharpen).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Manage sculpt masks on a mesh', which is a specific verb-resource pair. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'sculpt_mask_advanced' by focusing on basic mask actions such as clear, invert, smooth, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description lists available actions but does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'sculpt_mask_advanced' or other sculpt tools. There is no mention of prerequisites (e.g., sculpt mode) or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.