clear_parent

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains that with keep_transform=True the object stays in place, which is useful. However, with no annotations, it does not disclose prerequisites (e.g., object must have a parent) or side effects (e.g., world transform preservation details).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that includes the core action and a key parameter behavior. No extraneous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 params, no output schema), the description covers the main behavior. It lacks prerequisites and return value details, but for a straightforward operation it is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description is the sole source of parameter meaning. It clarifies the 'keep_transform' parameter's effect but does not explain the 'name' parameter beyond its name. This adds some value but not comprehensive.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Remove parent from an object.' It also distinguishes from sibling tools like 'set_parent' by specifying the removal operation. The mention of the keep_transform parameter adds precision.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use (to remove parent) but lacks explicit guidance on alternatives or when not to use. It does not reference sibling tools like 'set_parent' or 'remove_constraint'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.