smokeball_delete_layout

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It fails to mention that this is a destructive operation, any authentication requirements beyond JWT/tenant/company scope, or potential side effects such as cascading deletions of associated data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (3 sentences) but front-loads a routing detail that is likely irrelevant for agent invocation. It could be restructured to prioritize purpose and parameter usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive delete operation, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain what a layout is, how to identify which layout to delete, any irreversible consequences, or expected behavior. Although an output schema exists, it does not compensate for the lack of operational context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter 'arguments' is a JSON string with 0% schema coverage. The description only states it contains 'arguments for the connector operation' without specifying expected keys (e.g., layout_id, confirmation flag). This adds minimal value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The tool name clearly indicates deletion of a layout, and the description repeats the operation name. However, it does not define what a 'layout' is in Smokeball context, and the description is essentially a tautology of the name without adding specific verb-resource clarity. It is minimally clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., smokeball_update_layout or smokeball_get_layout). There is no mention of prerequisites, conditions for deletion, or situational context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.