Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to lightbulb-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets Claude Code or any MCP client delegate coding tasks to the local Cursor Agent CLI, with persistent per-workspace sessions and tools for diffing and pushing changes.
      12 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server wrapping the Cursor CLI agent, enabling Claude Code and other MCP clients to delegate tasks to Cursor's AI agent for file writing, bash commands, and codebase queries.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Code intelligence MCP server for Claude Code providing multi-project code graph, semantic search, session history, knowledge base, and web search.
      15
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.1/5.0

    Scored across 1750 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    Hundreds of tools overlap in purpose: the same domain actions appear as both <domain>_<action> and generic dispatch_domain_agent, Salesforce actions are duplicated with and without the connector_ prefix, and document/Stripe operations exist in several parallel surfaces (search_documents vs document_intelligence_search_documents, stripe_dispatch vs stripe_raw_api_request). An agent would frequently misselect among these near-duplicates.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    All names are snake_case, but the pattern is not consistent: some are verb_noun (list_workflows, create_company), some are noun-centric (company_reviews, stripe_dispatch), some are provider_operation (clio_create_matter), and some add a connector_ prefix to already existing tools (connector_salesforce_bulk_ingest_close). It is readable in clusters but there is no single predictable convention across the set.

    Tool Count1/5

    1750 tools is an extreme mismatch for any coherent MCP surface. Even a platform with many domains cannot be meaningfully navigated by an agent at this size, and no reasonable scoping guideline is approached.

    Completeness3/5

    Coverage is extensive across companies, domains, connectors, workflows, and memory context, and generic escape hatches (dispatch_domain_agent, invoke_tool, ask_document_agent) fill some gaps. However, many connector surfaces expose only read/list operations without matching writes, and the enormous, partially duplicated toolset makes it difficult to verify coherent lifecycle coverage for any given domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues