coding_website_growth_loop_build

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only mentions routing and scope, but does not indicate whether the action is destructive, creates resources, or requires authentication beyond JWT. The term 'build' suggests mutation, but no explicit confirmation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is succinct—4 sentences with clear front-loading of the action name and routing context. Each sentence adds information, though the overall brevity limits completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (2 optional params, no annotations, many similar siblings), the description is insufficient for an agent to correctly select and invoke the tool. It omits return value details (despite an output schema existing), side effects, and usage context. The agent must rely on the action name alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description compensates minimally by explaining `message` as 'Free-text objective' and `inputs` as 'Optional JSON string of structured inputs'. This adds basic meaning beyond the schema titles, but lacks detail on expected JSON structure or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it 'Run the coding domain agent action `website_growth_loop_build`' and mentions routing through a dispatcher, but does not explain what the action accomplishes beyond its name. It vaguely distinguishes from siblings like `coding_app_growth_loop_build` by the action name only, lacking specific verb-resource clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, side effects, or situations to avoid. Siblings like `coding_app_growth_loop_build` are not differentiated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.