github_list_dependabot_alerts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It mentions routing and argument format but lacks details on output, pagination, rate limits, or authentication needs. The tool's safety profile (read vs write) is not indicated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (3 sentences) but poorly structured. The first sentence is redundant, the second about routing is irrelevant for tool selection, and the third on arguments is minimal. Could be more front-loaded with key functional info.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description lacks context on what Dependabot alerts are, how to scope the list (e.g., per repository), or any filtering capabilities. The single-parameter tool is underspecified for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description adds almost no parameter info beyond 'arguments: JSON string of arguments for the connector operation.' No details on required fields like owner, repo, or state, leaving the agent without guidance on constructing valid input.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists Dependabot alerts, specifying verb and resource. However, it fails to distinguish from siblings like github_list_code_scanning_alerts or github_list_secret_scanning_alerts, and the first sentence is a tautological restatement of the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool over alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or context for listing Dependabot alerts.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.