page_builder_deploy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It only states the deployment action ('make the site live') without explaining side effects (e.g., overwriting live site, reversibility, failure states, or permissions required). This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one purpose sentence followed by a brief list of parameters. Every sentence serves a purpose with no unnecessary detail. It is front-loaded with the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a deployment tool, the description lacks critical context: what constitutes a valid session? Does deployment replace the entire site or add pages? Are there rollback options? What does the output schema return? While the output schema exists, the description should at least hint at its structure or typical response. The tool's complexity warrants more detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, but the description adds meaning for page_key (optional, specific page or all). session_id is only described as 'The session ID', which adds little beyond its name. Overall, the description partially compensates for the lack of schema descriptions but could be more specific about session_id's origin.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Deploy'), the resource ('a page builder session'), and the result ('make the site live'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like page_builder_preview (preview before deployment) and page_builder_create (create a session).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains that session_id is required and page_key is optional, with the effect of deploying a specific page or all pages. However, it does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., page_builder_preview, page_builder_unpublish), nor any prerequisites (e.g., session must be built/active).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.