commerce_resume_sync

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full behavioral burden. It mentions JWT/tenant/company scope but does not disclose side effects, such as whether resuming is safe or destructive, or what triggers (e.g., long-running process). Minimal transparency beyond authentication context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise with two sentences and two parameter descriptions. Front-loaded with the action. No unnecessary words, but could include more context without increasing length significantly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given two optional parameters, an output schema exists, and sibling tools include sync variants, the description lacks essential context: what 'resume' implies, prerequisites (e.g., a paused sync), and how output is structured. Incomplete for a tool in a domain with related sync operations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so description adds meaning: 'message' is a free-text objective, 'inputs' is an optional JSON string of structured inputs. This clarifies semantics beyond the schema but remains vague—no details on expected format or purpose of inputs. Adequate but not thorough.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Run' and the specific resource 'commerce domain agent action resume_sync', indicating it resumes a sync. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like commerce_catalog_sync or commerce_sync_status, limiting differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Excludes context like prerequisites for resuming a sync or when not to use. Siblings like commerce_catalog_sync suggest alternative sync operations, but no comparison is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.