salesforce_bulk_ingest_close

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose side effects and behavioral details, but it only mentions routing and authentication. It does not state whether the tool finalizes a job, returns results, or has destructive effects, leaving a significant information gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, but brevity is not beneficial when it omits critical information. It lacks front-loaded purpose and clear structure, though it is not verbose. An agent would need significant context from elsewhere to use it correctly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of sibling bulk ingest tools and an output schema, the description should explain how this tool fits into the workflow (e.g., after uploading data). It fails to provide that context, leaving the tool's role ambiguous.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter 'arguments' has zero schema coverage, and the description only says it is a JSON string of arguments for the connector operation. This adds virtually no semantic meaning—no structure, required keys, or examples are provided, failing to compensate for the missing schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only names the operation as 'bulk_ingest_close' without explaining what closing a bulk ingest entails. It does not distinguish from sibling tools like salesforce_bulk_ingest_create or salesforce_bulk_ingest_results, leaving the agent to guess the purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites (e.g., an active bulk ingest job), or what state the system should be in. The description is purely procedural (routing info) rather than usage-oriented.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.