lightbulb_describe_capability

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior, and the description is consistent with this by using 'Load'. It adds the nuance of 'one discovered capability' but does not disclose additional side effects or requirements beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description is clear about the action, it lacks explicit details on what 'schema and safety metadata' includes and does not explain the expected input format. This leaves some context missing for effective use, but the tool is simple enough that it might suffice.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'name' has no description in the schema. The tool description implies it is the name of a discovered capability, but it does not explicitly define the parameter, leaving its meaning partially ambiguous.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool loads schema and safety metadata for a single discovered capability, using the verb 'Load' and specifying the scope. It differentiates from sibling tools like lightbulb_find_capabilities and lightbulb_use_* capabilities by focusing on describing a capability.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like lightbulb_find_capabilities. It only implies that it is for a discovered capability but doesn't state a workflow or exclusion conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.