finalize_company_blueprint_activation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description says 'activate' which implies a state change, but doesn't disclose any side effects or reversibility. Since annotations are all false, the description carries the burden and is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is brief but includes the key condition. However, it doesn't explain what 'independent gates' means or the outcome, but given the simple action, it's mostly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description provides no explanation of the three parameters; the schema also lacks descriptions. The names are somewhat self-explanatory but not fully defined.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb 'activate' and a resource 'deployment' with a condition. It clearly distinguishes from other deployment tools like finalize_company_blueprint_deployment by focusing on activation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states the precondition that gates must have passed, indicating when to use it. It doesn't name alternatives but provides a clear condition.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.