it_ops_plan_domain_intelligence

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states it 'routes through the platform's domain-agent dispatcher' without explaining side effects, read/write nature, or permissions. The description adds little beyond the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but includes internal routing details that are unlikely to help the agent. It could be more concise by omitting the routing line and focusing on actionable content. The structure is adequate but not optimal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description does not mention the output schema despite its existence, nor does it explain what the action returns or accomplishes. Given the tool is part of a family of domain agents, critical context about the action's outcome is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds brief parameter meanings ('Free-text objective for the action' and 'Optional JSON string of structured inputs') which are not present in the schema (0% coverage). However, the explanations lack examples or constraints, offering only minimal guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says 'Run the it_ops domain agent action plan_domain_intelligence' but does not clarify what 'plan_domain_intelligence' actually does. It fails to differentiate from many siblings with the same pattern (e.g., coding_plan_domain_intelligence, commerce_plan_domain_intelligence), leaving the agent without a clear understanding of the tool's purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description mentions routing details (JWT, tenant, company scope) but does not advise on selecting among the many domain-specific 'plan_domain_intelligence' tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.