smokeball_create_folder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only mentions routing through JWT/tenant/company scope, but does not describe what the tool actually does (e.g., where the folder is created, error conditions, side effects). Little transparency beyond authentication context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded with the tool identity and routing. However, it is too minimal to be effective; conciseness is achieved but at the cost of completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of annotations, the description is insufficient for an agent to use the tool correctly. It lacks explanation of the folder's context, parameter details, and success/error conditions. The output schema exists but the description does not reference it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single 'arguments' parameter is described as a JSON string of arguments, but the schema lacks descriptions (0% coverage). The description does not specify the expected structure or keys, so it adds minimal value over the schema type.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The name 'create_folder' suggests creating a folder, but the description only restates the name and adds routing details without specifying what kind of folder or where it's created. It's moderately clear from the name but the description adds no specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like other Smokeball create tools or folder listing tools. The description lacks context about prerequisites or the role of folders in Smokeball.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.