smarthome_plan_domain_intelligence

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already signal destructiveHint=true, readOnlyHint=false, and idempotentHint=false. The description adds useful auth/scoping context ('under your JWT, tenant, and company scope'), but it does not disclose what side effects or destructive behavior the action may have. This is a moderate gap given the destructive annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and well-structured, with the main action front-loaded and arguments clearly listed. It avoids filler, though the first sentence and 'Args' section slightly overlap in mentioning the action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the destructive annotation, generic action semantics, and a huge sibling list, the description is under-specified. It does not say what the action accomplishes, when it should be invoked, what risks it carries, or how it differs from the many other domain planning tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the burden of explaining parameters. It adds minimal semantics: 'message' is a 'Free-text objective' and 'inputs' is an 'Optional JSON string of structured inputs.' This is helpful but lacks format details, examples, or what structured inputs are expected.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Run') and resource ('smarthome domain agent action `plan_domain_intelligence`') and clarifies that it routes through the domain-agent dispatcher. It is distinguishable from other tools by the explicit smarthome domain, though it never explains what 'plan_domain_intelligence' actually does, which slightly dims clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as smarthome_chat, smarthome_command_plan, or other *plan_domain_intelligence tools. It only states routing and scope, leaving the selection criteria entirely implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.