delete_crm_task
Remove a specific task from the CRM system using its unique task ID.
Instructions
Delete a CRM task.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| task_id | Yes | ||
| tenant_id | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Remove a specific task from the CRM system using its unique task ID.
Delete a CRM task.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| task_id | Yes | ||
| tenant_id | No |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description only states 'Delete a CRM task' without disclosing behavioral traits such as irreversibility, permission requirements, or side effects. For a destructive operation, this is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence. No wasted words, but at the cost of completeness. Structure is fine but could benefit from more detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple delete operation but missing important context: is it reversible? What happens to related data? Does it require confirmation? Output schema exists but description doesn't leverage it. Overall incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage. Description adds no information about parameters (task_id required, tenant_id optional). It does not explain what these parameters represent or how to use them.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action (Delete) and the resource (CRM task). It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_crm_task, update_crm_task, etc. by specifying the delete operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The context implies deletion use case, but there is no mention of prerequisites, conditions, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RPasquale/lightbulb-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server