commerce_product_analysis

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must carry the full burden. It mentions routing scope (JWT, tenant, company) but does not disclose whether the tool is read-only, destructive, or has side effects. Behavior beyond routing is opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the core action. It efficiently communicates the tool's function and parameters without unnecessary text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of many sibling commerce tools and no schema descriptions, the description is incomplete. It fails to differentiate this tool from alternatives or to justify its use, leaving the agent without sufficient context to choose correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description provides the only parameter information. It describes 'message' as a free-text objective and 'inputs' as an optional JSON string, but lacks details on expected formats or constraints. This is basic but adequate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that it runs the 'product_analysis' action in the commerce domain, routing through the platform's dispatcher. However, it does not explain what product analysis does, leaving some ambiguity about the tool's specific purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other commerce tools or under what conditions. The description lacks any contextual cues or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.