slack_assistant_set_suggested_prompts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It only discloses routing and auth scope but omits critical details: whether the operation overwrites existing prompts, side effects, rate limits, or output structure. For a mutation tool, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (three sentences) but lacks substance. It is front-loaded with the operation name but does not earn its keep by providing meaningful guidance. Conciseness is not a virtue when it sacrifices necessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's mutation nature and lack of annotations, output schema is not shown but claimed to exist. The description does not explain what the tool does to the assistant, how to structure the arguments, or what to expect in the response. Incomplete for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description only states that 'arguments' is a JSON string of arguments for the connector operation. It does not describe expected keys, format, or constraints. With one opaque parameter, more detail is needed to guide correct usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool sets suggested prompts for the Slack assistant. The name is self-explanatory, and the description adds routing context. However, it does not differentiate from sibling assistant tools like slack_assistant_set_status or slack_assistant_set_title, but the resource 'suggested prompts' is distinct enough.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, scenarios, or comparisons with other slack_assistant_set_* tools. The agent must infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.