jira_close_sprint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose side effects. It only mentions routing but not that closing a sprint may modify issue statuses or move unresolved issues to backlog. No info on permissions or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but includes irrelevant routing details. The Args section is unhelpful. It is not front-loaded with the most critical information (what sprint to close).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema (not shown), the description does not mention return value or behavior. The tool is a mutation that likely returns sprint details, but this is omitted. Overall incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'arguments' is described as a JSON string of arguments, with no schema coverage (0%). The description does not specify expected fields (e.g., sprintId, remainingEstimate) or format, leaving the agent with no actionable information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it closes a sprint, which is a specific action on a resource. However, it lacks details on what closing a sprint entails (e.g., moving incomplete issues, ending the sprint period) and does not differentiate from sibling tools like jira_start_sprint beyond the verb.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., jira_start_sprint, jira_add_to_sprint). Missing prerequisites such as sprint ID or active sprint requirements.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.