okx_ws_close

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description fails to disclose whether the tool is destructive, what authentication is needed, or any side effects. A close operation should at minimum indicate that it terminates the connection, but the description omits this entirely.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, but it wastes characters on non-informative tags and a Chinese note. It could be more concise and front-loaded with a clear action statement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 'close' operation, the description should clearly state the action, prerequisites, and any return values. It only hints at a prerequisite (agent_catalog) and fails to explain the core function, making it incomplete for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with one optional parameter described in the schema. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses cryptic tags like '[L:READ] CAT:[行情-WS]' and a Chinese prerequisite note, but never explicitly states that this tool closes a WebSocket connection. The purpose is vague and relies on interpreting the tool name and categorization.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises calling 'agent_catalog' first, which is a usage guideline, but it offers no comparison to sibling WebSocket tools (e.g., okx_ws_subscribe, okx_ws_unsubscribe) or guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.