okx_get_position_builder_graph

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It only indicates a read operation via '[L:READ]' and a category. It lacks details on side effects, required permissions, return format, or any behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but poorly structured. It uses cryptic symbols and lacks clear sentences. Important information is not front-loaded, and the format is not user-friendly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's name suggests a potentially complex graph related to position building, the description is severely incomplete. There is no explanation of what the graph represents, the output format, or why agent_catalog is a prerequisite. Without annotations or output schema, the description fails to provide adequate context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description does not add parameter semantics, but with zero parameters, the baseline of 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is vague. It labels the tool as a read operation in the '账户' (account) category but does not state what 'position builder graph' means or what it does. The purpose is unclear beyond being a read operation related to accounts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs to call agent_catalog first ('请先调用 agent_catalog'), which is a usage dependency. However, it provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus the many sibling tools, nor when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.