okx_get_borrow_repay_history

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only hints at read-only behavior via '[L:READ]'. It omits details on authentication, rate limits, side effects, or data scope, leaving the agent underinformed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but fails to front-load essential purpose information. It uses cryptic tags and a reference to another tool, sacrificing clarity for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema and parameter details, the description should explain the content of the history. It does not, leading to ambiguity, especially with similar sibling tools present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters (0), and schema description coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter information, which is acceptable since there are none to explain.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses tags like '[L:READ]' and 'CAT:[账户]' but does not explicitly state what 'borrow repay history' entails. It relies on the tool name for meaning, which is insufficient for clear understanding.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'okx_borrow_repay' or 'okx_get_one_click_repay_history'. The only instruction is to call 'agent_catalog' first, which is a prerequisite, not usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.