okx_get_grid_positions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The [L:READ] tag suggests a read operation, but there is no explicit disclosure of behavior, return format, or safety implications. The description is too brief to convey behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one line) but lacks structure. It includes tags and a prerequisite, which is acceptable for a simple tool, but a bit more context would improve usability without adding much length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and one parameter, the description should explain what the tool returns. It does not. The prerequisite to call agent_catalog adds some context but is insufficient for complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully describes the only parameter (algoId) with a Chinese description stating it's required. The tool description adds no additional semantic value beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description tags [L:READ] and CAT:[策略-网格] hint at reading grid positions, but the purpose is vague. It does not clearly state that this tool retrieves grid trading positions for a specific algoId, nor does it distinguish from similar tools like okx_get_positions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a prerequisite (call agent_catalog first) but provides no when-to-use guidance, when-not-to-use conditions, or alternatives. This is minimal usability guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.