okx_set_auto_loan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must cover behavioral traits. It only indicates a write operation but does not disclose effects (e.g., enabling/disabling auto-loan), side effects, permissions, or rate limits. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While extremely short, the description sacrifices informativeness for brevity. It does not effectively communicate what the tool does, leading to under-specification rather than conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a setting tool (likely with consequences) and no output schema or annotations, the description is grossly incomplete. It fails to explain what auto-loan is, how side affects it, or any prerequisites beyond calling agent_catalog.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the built-in descriptions of ccy and side already explain their meaning. The description adds no extra semantic value, but the schema is sufficient; baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only states '[L:WRITE] CAT:[账户]' indicating a write operation in the account category, but fails to explicitly state the tool's purpose of setting auto-loan. The purpose is only inferable from the tool name, which is insufficient for an AI agent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like okx_borrow_repay or okx_set_auto_earn. The instruction to call agent_catalog first is vague and does not clarify use cases or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.