okx_predictions_list_events

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only mentions '[L:READ]' indicating read-only, but lacks details on data returned, side effects, or other behaviors. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short but front-loaded with read/category hints. However, the structure is ambiguous and lacks clear English phrasing, reducing clarity for non-Chinese agents.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and 4 parameters, the description fails to explain what the tool returns or how parameters affect results. Sibling tools like 'okx_predictions_search_events' exist but no differentiation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All 4 parameters (sort, limit, status, category) have descriptions in the schema (100% coverage), so the description adds no extra meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only indicates it's a read operation in the 'predictions' category ('[L:READ] CAT:[预测]'), but does not state it lists events. The purpose is vague and requires inference from the function name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to call 'agent_catalog' first ('→ 请先调用 agent_catalog'), providing a clear prerequisite. However, no guidance on when to use vs. sibling tools like 'okx_predictions_search_events'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.