okx_get_economic_calendar

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description identifies the tool as read-only ('L:READ') and public ('CAT:[公共]'), but fails to disclose other behavioral traits such as rate limits, authentication needs, or effects on state. The brief label is insufficient for transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one line), but it lacks crucial information. It is under-specified rather than concise; the brevity comes at the expense of clarity and completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and a minimal description, the tool definition fails to explain what the tool returns or how to interpret the data. The directive to call agent_catalog implies additional context is needed, but the description itself is nearly empty.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All three parameters are described in the input schema with Chinese explanations (e.g., '结束时间戳（毫秒）' for end timestamp). The description does not add additional meaning, but the schema coverage is 100%, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only provides a label '[L:READ] CAT:[公共]' and a directive to call agent_catalog first. It does not explicitly state that the tool retrieves economic calendar events, leaving the purpose vague. The verb is implied but not articulated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs the user to call agent_catalog before using this tool, indicating a prerequisite. However, it does not specify when to use this tool over alternatives, nor does it provide any context or use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.