okx_get_price_limit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. The '[L:READ]' hint suggests a read operation, but no further behavioral details (e.g., side effects, rate limits, required permissions) are disclosed. The description is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's full behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief (one line) but not effectively concise. It omits essential information and relies on cryptic tags. While not verbose, it fails to be informative, which reduces usability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one required parameter and no output schema, the description should explain what price limit data is returned and possibly the format. It does not, leaving the agent without enough context to use the tool properly. This is incomplete even for a simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides full coverage for the sole parameter 'instId' with a clear description. However, the tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so it does not improve the parameter semantics. Baseline 3 is appropriate given high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '[L:READ] CAT:[公共] | → 请先调用 agent_catalog' does not explicitly state the tool's purpose. It hints at being a public read operation and suggests a prerequisite, but the core action (getting price limits) is only inferred from the tool name. This is vague and lacks a clear verb-resource statement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a prerequisite ('请先调用 agent_catalog') but offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternative sibling tools (e.g., okx_get_ticker, okx_get_orderbook). There is no mention of when not to use it or what scenarios it is designed for.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.