okx_get_public_copy_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. The tag '[L:READ]' indicates the tool is read-only, but there is no information about required authentication, rate limits, or what the response contains. The description lacks substantive behavioral details beyond this tag.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with tags and a clear instruction. It avoids redundancy, but it is so sparse that it sacrifices substance. Still, it is concise with little waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is the sole source of context. It fails to explain what the tool returns, when to use it, or how it fits among many sibling tools related to copy trading. The description is severely incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters, so baseline is 4. The description does not add parameter-level meaning, but that is not needed. However, the description could have clarified the purpose of the tool despite no parameters, but for this dimension it meets the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only contains tags '[L:READ]' and 'CAT:[策略-跟单]' and a prerequisite instruction. It does not explicitly state what data the tool retrieves or how it differs from similar tools like okx_get_copy_settings or okx_get_public_lead_traders. The core purpose of 'get public copy config' is unclear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions '→ 请先调用 agent_catalog' as a prerequisite but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as okx_get_copy_settings or okx_get_public_lead_traders. No context about usage scenarios is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.