okx_get_margin_lending_ratio

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description only includes '[L:READ]' hinting at read-only, but lacks details on permissions, rate limits, or response behavior. It fails to compensate for the absence of annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short but cryptic, using machine-oriented tags. While concise, it sacrifices clarity and structure, making it less helpful for an AI agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the large number of sibling tools and no output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain return values, usage context, or how it differs from similar tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes the 'ccy' parameter with full coverage (100%), so the description does not need to add more. It neither adds nor detracts from parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses cryptic tags ('[L:READ] CAT:[统计]') and a prerequisite call but does not explicitly state that the tool retrieves margin lending ratios. Given many sibling tools with similar lending rate functions, this is insufficient for purpose identification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The only guidance is to call 'agent_catalog' first. There is no indication when to use this tool versus alternatives like okx_get_lending_rate_history or okx_get_lending_rate_summary.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.