okx_get_fiat_deposit_orders

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It only indicates a read operation via '[L:READ]', but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as pagination, limits, or dependencies beyond the vague reference to agent_catalog.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one line), which is concise but lacks structure. It uses tags and Chinese text, which may not be universally understood. It could be more efficient if it stated the purpose directly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and no output schema, the description should at least explain what the tool returns and how it fits into the workflow. The instruction to call agent_catalog hints at a dependency but is insufficiently explained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters in the schema, so the description does not need to add parameter details. Schema coverage is 100% trivially, earning a baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description does not explicitly state what the tool does. The label '[L:READ]' and category suggest it is a read operation for fiat deposit orders, but there is no clear verb or resource specification. The instruction '→ 请先调用 agent_catalog' is a prerequisite, not a purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus sibling tools like okx_get_fiat_deposit or okx_get_fiat_deposit_methods. The only usage hint is to call agent_catalog first, which lacks context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.