okx_predictions_get_event_markets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The [L:READ] tag indicates read-only behavior, but without annotations, the description should disclose more behavioral traits. It does not mention authentication, rate limits, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief but uses non-English text and brackets, making it less clear for an English-speaking audience. It could be more concise and standardized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of OKX predictions and the lack of output schema and annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what the tool returns or the nature of event markets.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no information beyond the input schema. The schema already describes eventId as required; the description only adds a prerequisite call but not parameter detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description indicates a read operation for event markets in the predictions category, but it uses Chinese and is not explicit about the result. It does not distinguish from sibling tools like okx_predictions_get_event.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states a prerequisite to call agent_catalog first, but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.