okx_predictions_get_event

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description includes '[L:READ]' which indicates a read-only operation, but with no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose any other behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects. Additional context from the '[L:READ]' tag is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (a single line), which is good for conciseness, but it sacrifices clarity and usefulness. It could be improved by adding a brief statement of the tool's core function while remaining brief.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description fails to explain what the tool returns or the context in which it should be used beyond the prerequisite call. It is incomplete for an agent to effectively decide when to invoke this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for its single parameter 'eventId' with a description '事件ID，必填'. The tool description adds no additional meaning or context for the parameter beyond what is already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses '[L:READ]' implying a read operation and 'CAT:[预测]' indicating the predictions category, but it does not explicitly state that the tool retrieves a specific prediction event by ID. The mention of '请先调用 agent_catalog' is a prerequisite, not a purpose statement. This is vague and does not clearly distinguish the tool from siblings like okx_predictions_list_events or okx_predictions_search_events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description only gives a prerequisite instruction ('请先调用 agent_catalog') which is a usage hint but does not explain when to use this tool over alternatives such as okx_predictions_list_events or okx_predictions_search_events. No contextual guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.