okx_predictions_positions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only contains a read hint. It does not disclose behavior such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects. The minimal description fails to inform the agent about important behavioral traits beyond the inferred read-only nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is not conciseness; it is under-specification. A valid description should be concise yet informative. This one omits crucial information, making it insufficient for correct tool selection.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the two optional parameters and no output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It does not clarify the return format, the meaning of 'predictions positions', or how to interpret results. The tool appears complex due to its domain (predictions), yet the description provides almost no contextual help.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds no meaning to the parameters 'status' and 'marketId'. It does not explain their purpose or acceptable values beyond the schema descriptions. The description is entirely generic and does not compensate for any lack of schema detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is minimal and does not clearly state the action. 'L:READ' hints at a read operation, but the purpose of retrieving 'predictions positions' is not explicitly articulated. The name itself is more informative than the description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a prerequisite to call 'agent_catalog' first, which provides some usage context. However, there is no guidance on when to use this tool versus similar tools like 'okx_get_positions' or other prediction tools. The prerequisite is noted but lacks situational guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.