okx_stop_copy_trading

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description only contains a write tag and a category label. It does not disclose effects, permissions, rate limits, or return behavior, leaving the agent blind to the tool's implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short but fails to be informative. Conciseness without clarity is not helpful. The structure uses tags but does not effectively convey key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complex domain and numerous sibling tools, this description is completely inadequate. It does not differentiate from similar tools like okx_stop_copy_trader, nor does it explain what 'stop copy trading' means or what the tool does.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (no parameters), so baseline is 3. The description adds no parameter-related value, but since there are no parameters, the baseline is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses cryptic tags and Chinese text that does not clearly state the tool's purpose. It hints at 'copy trading' and 'strategy' but lacks a clear verb and resource. The instruction to call agent_catalog first only adds confusion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The mention of agent_catalog is a prerequisite but does not help the agent decide when to invoke this tool among many copy-trading siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.