okx_predictions_orderbook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only indicates read-only via '[L:READ]' but does not explain data freshness, rate limits, or any side effects. The description is too minimal for an agent to understand behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely terse (one line) but sacrifices clarity for brevity. It contains cryptic labels and non-English text, which may be confusing. It is not well-structured for quick comprehension.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of output schema and annotations, the description should provide comprehensive context about return values, behavior, and usage. It fails to do so, leaving agents without critical information to correctly invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with both parameters (sz and instId) having descriptions in the schema. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond these, so it meets the baseline but does not enhance understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description contains cryptic labels '[L:READ] CAT:[预测]' and a directive to call agent_catalog, but fails to clearly state the tool's function. The name suggests retrieving a predictions orderbook, but the description does not clarify this or differentiate from sibling tools like okx_get_orderbook or outcomes_get_orderbook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions a prerequisite ('请先调用 agent_catalog'), implying the tool should not be used directly without prior context. However, it provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., okx_get_orderbook) or any exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.