okx_get_max_loan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only includes a cryptic tag '[L:READ]' which is non-standard. It discloses no behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions, or response behavior. With no annotations, the description fails to inform the agent about safety or behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but cryptic, using non-standard formatting (brackets, arrow) that reduces clarity. While concise in token count, it is not effectively structured for agent understanding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description should fully explain the tool's purpose and return values. It barely describes the tool and requires a separate catalog call, leaving the agent without enough context to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions. The tool description adds no additional semantic value beyond what the schema already provides, meeting the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is cryptic ('[L:READ] CAT:[账户] | → 请先调用 agent_catalog'). It indicates a read operation on account category but does not explicitly state that the tool retrieves the max loan amount, nor does it differentiate from siblings like okx_get_max_size or okx_get_max_withdrawal.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs to call agent_catalog first, providing some prerequisite guidance, but no explanation of when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor exclusions. The usage context remains unclear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.