okx_get_one_click_repay_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present. Description offers only the 'L:READ' hint to indicate a read operation, but lacks disclosure of other behavioral traits like authentication needs, side effects, or response structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is very short and front-loaded with the read label and category, but it lacks substantive content about the tool's function, making it minimally useful despite being concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fails to provide enough context. It only points to agent_catalog as a prerequisite, but doesn't explain what the tool returns or how it fits into a workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters defined, so baseline score is 4. Description does not need to add parameter meaning, and it does not attempt to do so.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description only provides a label 'L:READ' and category '交易', but no explicit verb or resource. Name suggests listing one-click repay, but description fails to confirm this, leaving purpose vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description includes a prerequisite instruction '请先调用 agent_catalog', but does not clarify when to use this tool vs. alternatives or provide context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.