okx_predictions_merge

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only indicates a write operation ('L:WRITE') with no details on side effects, permissions, or state changes. The agent is left uninformed about the tool's impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short but at the cost of clarity. Every sentence is present but provides minimal useful information. Not an example of effective conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a merge operation with no output schema and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain merging mechanics, return values, or any behavioral context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

One parameter 'amount' with schema describing it as required string. Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'L:WRITE CAT:[预测] | → 请先调用 agent_catalog' is vague. It signals a write operation and category 'predictions' but does not specify what 'merge' does (e.g., combine prediction outcomes, merge data). The verb+resource is unclear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'okx_predictions_split'. The instruction 'call agent_catalog first' hints at a prerequisite but does not explain the context or decision criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.