okx_get_event_series

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the full burden. It only states L:READ (likely read-only) but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as rate limits, data scope, or dependencies beyond the catalog call. Minimal value added.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but not effectively concise. It omits essential details at the cost of clarity. It front-loads the READ hint and category but leaves the tool's purpose ambiguous.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema and no annotations. The description is incomplete, failing to explain what data is returned, how to interpret the event series, or how it fits among numerous related sibling tools. The prerequisite hint is insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters (100% coverage), so baseline is 3. The description adds no parameter-related information, which is acceptable given the absence of parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is vague, only indicating it is a read operation in the '预测' (prediction) category and instructing to call agent_catalog first. It fails to specify what an event series is or how it differs from sibling tools like okx_get_event_events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear prerequisite ('请先调用 agent_catalog'), but offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no exclusions, and no context about its role in a workflow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.