okx_set_trading_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present. The description adds minimal behavioral insight beyond the '[L:WRITE]' tag. It does not describe side effects, required permissions, or what changes occur when executing this tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but it is under-specified rather than concise. It lacks essential information, making it ineffective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with only one parameter and no output schema, the description fails to explain the expected JSON structure, valid values, or effects. The tool is critical for configuration but is almost entirely opaque.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'jsonString' has a schema description that is nearly a tautology ('配置参数JSON字符串。必填'). Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds no extra meaning; it does not specify required fields or format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only includes tags like '[L:WRITE]' and 'CAT:[账户]' and a note to call agent_catalog first. It does not explicitly state what the tool does—e.g., which trading configuration is being set. The purpose is vague and relies on the name alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like okx_set_account_mode or okx_set_leverage. The only instruction is to call agent_catalog first, but no further context or differentiation is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.