okx_amend_copy_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It marks the tool as a write operation ('L:WRITE') and notes a prerequisite, but does not explain side effects, permissions, or what changes occur when amending copy settings.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but cryptic, using brackets and symbols. It is not structured for clarity and reads more like an internal note than a user-facing explanation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a write operation with no output schema, the description should explain return values or effects. It lacks completeness, only providing a prerequisite and write indicator. No behavioral or outcome details are given.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'L:WRITE' and 'CAT:[策略-跟单]' suggests a write operation for copy trading strategy, but does not explicitly state what 'amend copy settings' does. It is vague and relies on the tool name for purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a prerequisite '请先调用 agent_catalog' (call agent_catalog first), but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus other copy trading tools like okx_set_copy_settings or okx_first_copy_settings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.