okx_create_signal_bot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description carries full burden. Indicates write operation via '[L:WRITE]' but discloses no side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or success/failure behavior. Leaves agent unaware of the tool's impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise, but at the cost of clarity. The instruction to call agent_catalog is efficiently placed, but lacks explanatory sentences about the tool's function. Could be improved with brief context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool is a creation action with two required parameters and no output schema. Description fails to explain what a signal bot is, what channel/signalName mean, expected result, or error states. Incomplete for effective agent use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage with basic descriptions for channel and signalName. Description adds no further semantics; baseline 3 is appropriate since schema already documents parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description is cryptic with tags like '[L:WRITE] CAT:[策略-信号]' instead of explicitly stating the tool creates a signal bot. The instruction '→ 请先调用 agent_catalog' implies a prerequisite but does not clarify what the tool itself does. Relies heavily on the tool name for purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only provides a single prerequisite ('call agent_catalog first'). No guidance on when to use this tool vs siblings like okx_stop_signal_bot or okx_get_signal_bots_pending. No scenarios or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.