okx_preset_account_switch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist to disclose safety or side effects. The description only marks a write operation ('L:WRITE') via a cryptic prefix, but does not explain what the switch does, whether it is destructive, authentication needs, or other behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, which makes it concise but at the cost of clarity. The cryptic prefix uses internal jargon that may not be useful to an agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, no annotations, and many sibling tools, the description fails to provide sufficient context. It does not explain return values, prerequisites beyond agent_catalog, or how switching differs from other account operations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single parameter 'acctLv' has a clear description (target account level, required). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is vague; it uses a cryptic prefix '[L:WRITE] CAT:[账户]' and a Chinese hint to call agent_catalog first, but does not explicitly state that the tool switches an account preset. It does not distinguish from sibling tools like okx_set_account_mode or okx_get_account_config.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only a prerequisite to call agent_catalog first is given. No explicit when, when-not, or alternatives among the many account-related siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.