okx_get_interest_rate_loan_quota

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It indicates read-only via '[L:READ]' and public category, but lacks details on rate limits, error conditions, or consequences of skipping the prerequisite. This minimal disclosure is insufficient for safe agent invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one line with meta tags and a prerequisite note). While concise in length, it lacks substantive content, making it more under-specified than efficient. Every word should earn its place, but here the brevity comes at the cost of clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is the sole source of context. It fails to explain what the tool returns, how it behaves, or provide any usage examples. The prerequisite instruction is present but incomplete without further guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so schema coverage is trivially 100%. The description adds no parameter information, but none is needed. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the description does not detract but adds no value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only provides meta tags ('[L:READ] CAT:[公共]') and a prerequisite note but does not explicitly state what the tool retrieves. The name suggests it deals with interest rate loan quota, but without elaboration, the purpose remains vague and fails to differentiate from siblings like okx_get_interest_rates or okx_get_max_loan.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs to call agent_catalog first, offering a prerequisite guideline, but does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives or any contextual scenarios. No when-not-to-use information is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.