okx_predictions_trades

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only gives a category and prerequisite. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as what data is returned, pagination, rate limits, or side effects. The tool is likely safe (read), but transparency is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one line) but includes a tag and a prerequisite. It is concise but arguably too sparse for a tool with two parameters and no output schema. It does not waste words but also does not earn its place by being informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of the tool ecosystem and the lack of output schema, the description is insufficient. It does not explain what trades are returned, the scope of data, or how it relates to other predictions tools. The prerequisite to 'agent_catalog' hints at a workflow but is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions in Chinese, so the schema documents them adequately. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema; it merely provides a context tag. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description includes a '[L:READ]' tag indicating a read operation and 'CAT:[预测]' suggesting predictions category, but does not explicitly state that the tool retrieves trades for predictions. The tool name implies it, but the description is vague; a user might infer it gets trades but not clearly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs to call 'agent_catalog' first, which is a prerequisite, but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like 'okx_predictions_ticker' or 'okx_predictions_get_order'. No differentiation or context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.