okx_borrow_repay

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. The [L:WRITE] marker implies it is a mutating operation, but there is no explanation of side effects, permission requirements, rate limits, or expected outcomes. This is insufficient for an AI agent to understand the tool's impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but not concise; it is cryptic and lacks clarity. The use of Chinese abbreviations and the instruction to call agent_catalog first may confuse an agent. It could be more informative without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given there are 3 required parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is very incomplete. It fails to explain what the tool returns, error conditions, or how to interpret the result. The requirement to call agent_catalog first is mentioned but not explained. The tool's context is poorly defined.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers all parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The tool description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate since the schema alone is minimal but complete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only indicates it's a write operation for account category, but does not explicitly state that the tool is for borrowing or repaying funds. The name 'borrow_repay' hints at the action, but the description is vague and relies on Chinese terms and a prerequisite call to agent_catalog.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description instructs to call agent_catalog first, which serves as a usage prerequisite. However, it does not specify when to use this tool versus other account-related tools (e.g., okx_get_balance, okx_get_loan_info) or provide any exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.