okx_get_max_withdrawal
Retrieve the maximum withdrawal amount for a specified cryptocurrency on OKX exchange.
Instructions
[L:READ] CAT:[账户] | → 请先调用 agent_catalog
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ccy | No | 币种,如 USDT。不填返回全部 |
Retrieve the maximum withdrawal amount for a specified cryptocurrency on OKX exchange.
[L:READ] CAT:[账户] | → 请先调用 agent_catalog
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ccy | No | 币种,如 USDT。不填返回全部 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description carries the burden. It includes a read hint (L:READ) but does not disclose other behavioral traits such as permissions, side effects, or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short but not concise in a helpful way; it is cryptic and lacks clear structure. It does not earn its place with valuable content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity (1 param, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It fails to explain return values or behavior, leaving the agent with minimal context beyond the name and schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already describes the single parameter (ccy) with a clear description. The tool description adds no extra meaning, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description does not explicitly state what the tool does beyond a category tag and a reference to another tool. The name 'get_max_withdrawal' hints at the purpose, but the description itself lacks clarity and fails to define the tool's function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings. The description only directs to call agent_catalog first, which is not about tool selection or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/okx-wallet-H/hvip-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server