okx_get_spread_orders

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only includes a read hint '[L:READ]' (embedded, not standard annotation) but omits details like authentication needs, rate limits, or return behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short but not wasteful. However, it trades brevity for clarity, providing minimal useful information. It is adequately sized but under-informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given many sibling spread order tools and no output schema, the description fails to explain return values, ordering, or whether it covers pending/historical orders. It lacks necessary context for a tool with limited structured metadata.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter sprdId with a description ('价差合约ID'). The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description only tags the tool as a read operation for '策略-价差' (spread strategy) but does not specify what it retrieves (e.g., list of orders, details). It does not distinguish from sibling tools like okx_get_spread_orders_pending or okx_get_spread_orders_history.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions a prerequisite ('请先调用 agent_catalog') but gives no guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.