okx_get_block_tickers
Retrieve block tickers for spot, swap, futures, or options products to access large trade market data.
Instructions
[L:READ] CAT:[行情] | → 请先调用 agent_catalog
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| instType | Yes | 产品类型 |
Retrieve block tickers for spot, swap, futures, or options products to access large trade market data.
[L:READ] CAT:[行情] | → 请先调用 agent_catalog
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| instType | Yes | 产品类型 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as data freshness, pagination, or authentication requirements. The description only gives a category and a prerequisite, offering no transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short but overly cryptic. It lacks clarity and fails to convey essential information. Conciseness is achieved at the expense of usefulness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description should at least explain what a block ticker is and when to use it. It does not, leaving the agent without sufficient context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description does not add any meaning beyond the input schema. The sole parameter 'instType' is documented in the schema with an enum and description, but the description does not reference or explain it further.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description does not clearly state what the tool does. It provides a category label ('CAT:[行情]') and a prerequisite ('请先调用 agent_catalog'), but the purpose is vague. The name suggests it retrieves block tickers, but the description lacks specificity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'okx_get_ticker' or 'okx_get_tickers'. The only instruction is to call 'agent_catalog' first, which is a prerequisite, not a usage guideline.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/okx-wallet-H/hvip-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server